2012 ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/367056/residential-building-in-cieza-xavier-ozores Clipboard Architects: Xavier Ozores Area Area of this architecture project Area: 700 m² Area: 700 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project ArchDaily Photographs “COPY” 2012 Save this picture!© David Frutos+ 25 Share Year: CopyApartments•Cieza, Spain “COPY” Residential Building in Cieza / Xavier OzoresSave this projectSaveResidential Building in Cieza / Xavier Ozores photographs: David FrutosPhotographs: David FrutosClient:Promociones Martínez Lucas de CiezaBuilder:Contratas Díaz Ruiz s.lBudget:480.000 eurosCity:CiezaCountry:SpainMore SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!© David FrutosText description provided by the architects. We firmly decided to see this project as an opportunity when we firstly faced this narrow plot (barely wide 7,40 meters, 18 meters deep) for 5 flats and property dwelling building.This opportunity was brought forward when we first visited the plot in order to take advantage of facing a lively square, full of activity and a sunny façade.Save this picture!© David FrutosWe developed two openings in the prism we obtained as a result of the maximum floor area ratio for obtaining an interior patio for the dwellings and a centered skylight. This skylight allows passive ventilation (perimeter grille) apart from lighting up the building stairs.Save this picture!© David FrutosWe focused all our expressive capacity in the façade composition. We decided to setback the penthouse’s wall on the purpose of creating an accurate flying volume which defines a hollow which works as a balcony to the square ,protects the building entrance and makes the façade appear less svelte at the same time.Save this picture!© David FrutosInside this frame, our facade composition, with its apparent disorder, seeks to express its inhabitants individuality reflected in each home and represented by the furnishing which can be seen inside during summer nights.Save this picture!SectionReaching this point, you must realize that you have lost the property of the building projected, since it belongs from now on to its inhabitants.Project gallerySee allShow less’The Great Sky’: Great Fen Visitor Center Competition Entry / Nicholas Hare ArchitectsUnbuilt ProjectMontfullà House / Hidalgo HartmannSelected ProjectsProject locationAddress:Cieza, EspañaLocation to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address. Share Year: Spain Apartments Projects Residential Building in Cieza / Xavier Ozores ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/367056/residential-building-in-cieza-xavier-ozores Clipboard CopyAbout this officeXavier OzoresOfficeFollowProductConcrete#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousingApartmentsCiezaHousingSpainPublished on May 02, 2013Cite: “Residential Building in Cieza / Xavier Ozores” 02 May 2013. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021.
Home Indiana Agriculture News New Ownership and Focus Make Farm Show Successful SHARE Facebook Twitter By Gary Truitt – Dec 13, 2018 SHARE Previous articleConservation Districts Approve New WOTUS RuleNext articleNew Technology Brings Large Crowd to Farm Show Gary Truitt New Ownership and Focus Make Farm Show Successful Facebook Twitter This year represents the 40th year for the Indiana Farm Equipment and Technology Expo. The December farm show had been in trouble for several years; dwindling attendance and exhibitor count forced previous ownership to cancel the show in January. Two Indiana media companies, Hoosier Ag Today ad Farm World Newspaper, picked up the show, renamed the event, and refocused it. These changes resulted in a significant jump in exhibitor numbers and farmer attendance over the past 3 days. On Tuesday, the first day of the show, attendance numbers topped the best day of the 2017 show. On Thursday, helped by the offering of a free lunch, attendance set a record for the final day of the Expo.Of the more than 180 exhibitors, over 30 were first time exhibitors at the show. Several large equipment firms indicated they would be expanding their displays at the show in 2019. An expanded seminar program, demonstration area, and a new fresh look to the show floor impressed attendees and exhibitors alike.The highlight of the event was the Drone-a-day giveaway. A professional Phantom 4 Drone was given away in a random drawing each day of the expo. Winners are Randy Neff, Jim Lankford and Heather Morris.The 2019 Expo will be held December 10-12.
News June 29, 2010 – Updated on January 20, 2016 Online newspaper editor’s murder still unpunished nearly 10 years later Crimean journalist “confesses” to spying for Ukraine on Russian TV News News News UkraineEurope – Central Asia February 26, 2021 Find out more Receive email alerts Organisation UkraineEurope – Central Asia Reporters Without Borders welcomes the meeting that took place between President Viktor Yanukovych and Lesya Gongadze, the mother of slain journalist Georgiy Gongadze on 21 June, two weeks after she said during an interview for Deutsche Welle that she would like to be able to discuss the investigation into her son’s murder with the new president.The details of what they discussed have not been released as the investigation is still ongoing.Gongadze was a politically committed journalist who edited the online newspaper Ukrainskaya Pravda. A critic of then President Leonid Kuchma, he was kidnapped on 16 September 2000 in Kiev. DNA tests carried out on a headless body found two months later ultimately confirmed that it was Gongadze’s. His mother was among those who had called for independent analyses. The initial lack of progress in the investigation highlighted the difficulties of combating impunity in Ukraine. That changed after Viktor Yushchenko took over as president in January 2005 but, despite his declared desire to solve the case, the investigation has yet to reach its conclusion.Two police colonels arrested on 1 March 2005 told investigators that Gen. Oleksiy Pukach, the former head of the interior ministry’s intelligence service, had personally strangled Gongadze. After being arrested and questioned, Pukach was released. He then disappeared although subject to judicial control. He was finally rearrested on 21 July 2009 in a village in the north of the country.Meanwhile, on 12 July 2009, the Kiev supreme court ruled that secret recordings made by former President Kuchma’s bodyguard, Mykola Melnichenko, could be incorporated into the investigation. Previously declared inadmissible, the recordings were expected to open the way to the identification of the senior officials believed to have ordered Gongadze’s murder.The day after Gen. Pukach’s second arrest, investigators announced he had confessed to strangling Gongadze on the orders of senior officials. He has since been held on pre-trial detention under article 156 of the code of criminal procedure but his trial has yet to take place.Three former police officers who were under Pukach’s command – Mykola Protasov, Oleksandr Popovich and Valeri Kostenko – were convicted on 15 March 2008 of being accomplices to Gongadze’s murder. Protasov was sentenced to 13 years in prison. The other two got 12 years.Gongadze would have been 41 on 21 May. In a statement on his birthday, his widow, Myroslava Gongadze, said the authorities had never informed her about what was happening in the investigation and, 10 years after his murder, she was unaware of the current state of the case. Help by sharing this information to go further March 26, 2021 Find out more Follow the news on Ukraine Ukraine escalates “information war” by banning three pro-Kremlin media Ukrainian media group harassed by broadcasting authority RSF_en September 7, 2020 Find out more
Pinterest Twitter Twitter Australian leader urges Facebook to lift its news blockade Local NewsBusinessUS NewsWorld News Facebook Pinterest Rick RycroftFront pages of Australian newspapers are displayed featuring stories about Facebook in Sydney, Friday, Feb. 19, 2021. In a surprise retaliatory move Thursday, Facebook blocked Australians from sharing news stories, escalating a fight with the government over whether powerful tech companies should have to pay news organizations for content. WhatsApp By Digital AIM Web Support – February 19, 2021 Facebook WhatsApp TAGS Previous articleEverbridge annuncia di essersi aggiudicata cinque contratti relativi alle soluzioni Public Warning con società di trasmissioni wireless, governi e Stati finalizzati alla protezione delle persone e delle aziende in Europa e in AsiaNext articleWilliams career-high 32 sparks WSU to romp over Cal 82-51 Digital AIM Web Support
Demand Propels Home Prices Upward 2 days ago The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced today that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will extend buying qualified loans in forbearance as well as several loan origination flexibilities. Governmental Measures Target Expanded Access to Affordable Housing 2 days ago Tagged with: Fannie and Freddie Loan Flexibility August 26, 2020 1,594 Views in Daily Dose, Featured, Foreclosure, Government, News About Author: Christina Hughes Babb The GSEs also will continue to extend several loan origination flexibilities, first set to expire in a few days, until September 30. Said flexibilities include alternative appraisals on purchase and rate term refinance loans; alternative methods for documenting income and verifying employment before loan closing; and expanding the use of power of attorney and remote online notarizations to assist with loan closings. Data Provider Black Knight to Acquire Top of Mind 2 days ago The Week Ahead: Nearing the Forbearance Exit 2 days ago Share Save “Extending these COVID-19 flexibilities helps keep the mortgage market moving and borrowers safe during the pandemic,” said Director Mark Calabria.To learn more about the following flexibilities, click through the corresponding links: buying qualified loans in forbearance; alternative appraisals on purchase and rate term refinance loans; alternative methods for documenting income and verifying employment before loan closing; and expanding the use of power of attorney to assist with loan closings. Servicers Navigate the Post-Pandemic World 2 days ago To support homeowners and mortgage lenders, the agency approved a continued extension of a temporary policy allowing for the purchase of certain single-family mortgages in forbearance, in circumstances that meet specific eligibility criteria set by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The policy, formerly extended for loans originated through August 31, now is extended through September 30. FHFA Announces Extension for Buying Qualified Loans in Forbearance Related Articles Demand Propels Home Prices Upward 2 days ago Subscribe Servicers Navigate the Post-Pandemic World 2 days ago Data Provider Black Knight to Acquire Top of Mind 2 days ago Governmental Measures Target Expanded Access to Affordable Housing 2 days ago Sign up for DS News Daily Fannie and Freddie Loan Flexibility 2020-08-26 Christina Hughes Babb The Best Markets For Residential Property Investors 2 days ago Print This Post Home / Daily Dose / FHFA Announces Extension for Buying Qualified Loans in Forbearance Previous: COVID-19’s Impact on Mortgage-Backed Securities Next: Most Competitive Housing Markets The Best Markets For Residential Property Investors 2 days ago Christina Hughes Babb is a reporter for DS News and MReport. A graduate of Southern Methodist University, she has been a reporter, editor, and publisher in the Dallas area for more than 15 years. During her 10 years at Advocate Media and Dallas Magazine, she published thousands of articles covering local politics, real estate, development, crime, the arts, entertainment, and human interest, among other topics. She has won two national Mayborn School of Journalism Ten Spurs awards for nonfiction, and has penned pieces for Texas Monthly, Salon.com, Dallas Observer, Edible, and the Dallas Morning News, among others.
ColumnsTimely Completion Of CIRP Under IBC Post 2019 Amendment A Conundrum Sonalika Ahuja & Anshita Gupta2 Jun 2020 2:48 AMShare This – xAs per Section 12 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “Code”), Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as “CIRP”) should be completed within 180 days from the date of admission of application by financial or operational creditor to initiate such process. However, this period can be further extended to maximum 90 days, provided…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginAs per Section 12 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “Code”), Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as “CIRP”) should be completed within 180 days from the date of admission of application by financial or operational creditor to initiate such process. However, this period can be further extended to maximum 90 days, provided an application is filed before the adjudicating authority (i.e. NCLT) by the Resolution Professional (hereinafter referred to as “RP”) upon instruction of the resolution passed at the meeting of committee of creditors (hereinafter referred to as “CoC”) by an affirmative vote of 66% of voting shares, thereby making 270 days as the outer limit for completion of CIRP. It is to be noted that as per the first proviso to Section 12, extension of period of CIRP shall not be granted more than once. However, the second proviso inserted by way of an amendment made in 2019 stated that CIRP shall be mandatorily completed within 330 days from the insolvency commencement date, including any extension of the period of CIRP and time taken in legal proceedings in relation to such resolution process. The first and second proviso of Section 12 of the Code when read in conjunction creates an ambiguity as to whether the period of CIRP can be extended beyond 270 days, as to do so an application for extension has to be filed before the NCLT ‘more than once’. The two divergent interpretations may arise depending upon the intention of the legislature, which are as follows:- Given that first proviso is not deleted intentionally and has to be followed to the letter then it may be deduced that it is mandatory to complete CIRP in 270 days and additional 60 days time limit is exclusively reserved for the completion of legal proceedings in relation to such resolution process; In case the first proviso is not strictly followed then it may seem that the 330 days time limit is an overall upper limit for completion of both, CIRP and legal proceedings in relation to such resolution process, and no separate time limit has been prescribed for completion of both, in which case, the first proviso will become redundant. Now, the question arises whether in a situation as given below, will NCLT extend the deadline or will it order the company to go into liquidation as the CIRP completion date has been overdue:- In a CIRP of a company, where all legal proceedings in relation to resolution process are completed, on 179th day of CIRP, RP upon the instruction of CoC approaches NCLT for extension of 60 days and NCLT grants the extension. Thereafter, CoC and RP realizes that they need maximum 60 more days to complete CIRP. In this scenario, CIRP will be completed within 300 days of its initiation provided that NCLT grants the extension second time. Now, if any such situation arises, how one is suppose to interpret the section in order to determine the period of extension. The Supreme Court in the case of Surendra Trading Company v. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Ltd. , while holding that the timeline mandates under section 7(5) or 9(5) or section 10 (4) of the Code are directory and procedural in nature, has accepted that it is well-settled principle of law that where ‘Adjudicating Authority’ has to perform a statutory function like admitting or rejecting an application within a time period prescribed, the time period would have to held to be directory and not mandatory. Furthermore, the apex court held that a provision in a statute which is procedural in nature although employs the word “shall” may not be held to be mandatory if thereby no prejudice is caused. In the matter of Rave Scans Pvt. Ltd., NCLT, principal bench while deciding the fate of company whose CIRP period exceeded 270 days timeline under Section 12, enunciated the principle that the act of court shall harm no man. The tribunal contemplated the aftermath in case the proceedings go beyond 180 or 270 days period, which is comparable to the corporate death. The tribunal stated that the only reasonable construction of the code is the balance to be maintained between timely completion of corporate insolvency process and the corporate debtor otherwise being put into liquidation. In another relatively recent matter of Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta and Ors., the Supreme Court struck down the word ‘mandatorily’ in the second proviso to the section 12 of the Code and held it as being manifestly arbitrary under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Apex Court held that – “The effect of this declaration is that ordinarily the time taken in relation to the corporate resolution process of the corporate debtor must be completed within the outer limit of 330 days from the insolvency commencement date, including extensions and the time taken in legal proceedings. However, on the facts of a given case, if it can be shown to the Adjudicating Authority and/or Appellate Tribunal under the Code that only a short period is left for completion of the insolvency resolution process beyond 330 days, and that it would be in the interest of all stakeholders that the corporate debtor be put back on its feet instead of being sent into liquidation and that the time taken in legal proceedings is largely due to factors owing to which the fault cannot be ascribed to the litigants before the Adjudicating Authority and/or Appellate Tribunal, the delay or a large part thereof being attributable to the tardy process of the Adjudicating Authority and/or the Appellate Tribunal itself, it may be open in such cases for the Adjudicating Authority and/or Appellate Tribunal to extend time beyond 330 days.” Hence, the above mentioned Essar Steel case has provided the much needed clarity to the interpretation of first and second proviso to Section 12 of the Code. It has provided a balanced approach by keeping into consideration the timely completion of the CIRP as well as the interest of the corporate debtor and other stakeholders, in whose benefit; the second and third provisos were inserted. Therefore, keeping all this in mind, it can be said that post 2019 amendment, the first proviso can be interpreted as procedural/directory in nature and the word ‘shall’ can be construed as ‘may’. Furthermore, it is also important to note if certain exceptional and unforeseen circumstances arise which makes an insolvency resolution process impossible then by the order of NCLT/NCLAT, the period of such exceptional situation could be excluded from the calculation of time period of CIRP. An apt example of this would be pandemic, i.e. spread of Covid -19. In the wake of this pandemic situation, NCLAT New Delhi took suo-moto cognizance of the unprecedented situation arising out of spread of Covid-19 virus and ordered that the period of lockdown (including extension of such period), where the registered office of the corporate debtor is located, shall be excluded for the purpose of calculation of the CIRP period under Section 12 of the Code in all cases where CIRP has been initiated and pending before the NCLT and/or, NCLAT. Views Are Personal Only  Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2019  Surendra Trading Company v. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Ltd. and Ors., 2018 AIR SC 18; See also P.T. Rajan v. T.P.M. Sahir and Ors.,(2003) 8 SCC 498  Rave Scans Pvt. Ltd., CA No. 628 (PB)/2018; See also Quantum Limited v. Indus Finance Corporation Limited, CA (AT) (Insolvency) No. 35 of 2018.  Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta and Ors., (2019) 16 SCALE 319.  Suo Moto – Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 01 of 2020. Next Story
Seminole County Sheriff(SEMINOLE COUNTY, Fla.) — A Florida man was stabbed to death after being lured into a “revenge” trap allegedly by two former roommates, who accused him of stealing a PlayStation 4 video game, officials said.The suspects, Jake Bilotta, 22, and Ian McClurg, 21, were arrested after their new roommate came home to find them allegedly trying to stuff the victim’s body into a plastic garbage bag, Seminole County Sheriff Dennis Lemma said at a news conference on Tuesday.“They lured him back there for revenge,” Lemma said of the victim, who was identified Wednesday as Joshua Barnes, 24, according to Seminole County Sheriff’s Office.Lemma said the victim lived with Bilotta and McClurg at a home in Maitland, Florida, for about two weeks before he was evicted earlier this month.Lemma said the suspects believed Barnes broke into their home over the weekend and stole a PlayStation 4 video game.“It is the most bizarre and disgraceful act that one can imagine … over these gaming systems and things that have little value, definitely no association with the value of human life whatsoever,” Lemma said.He said Barnes was stabbed multiple times with a 7-inch chef’s knife.Investigators believe Bilotta and McClurg invited the victim over to their home just before midnight Monday on the pretense that they would go to a party together, Lemma said.“At that time, Jake met the individual armed with a 7-inch chef’s knife … got him into the house and stabbed [Barnes] multiple times,” Lemma said.The sheriff said that while Bilotta allegedly stabbed Barnes numerous times, McClurg was equally involved because he helped Bilotta plan the killing.The suspects’ new roommate came home from a Tinder date Monday and found Bilotta and McClurg allegedly trying to put the victim’s body into plastic trash bags, Lemma said.“The plan was to kill him, put him in plastic bags and then find someplace to bury him,” Lemma said.He said the roommate who stumbled upon the killing ran back to his car where his date was waiting and called 911.McClurg and Bilotta were both arrested on suspicion of premeditated homicide charges and booked at the John E. Polk Correctional Facility in Sanford, Florida.Copyright © 2018, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.
Graeme CarlingThe PRS Group, emerging as a major player in the UK’s property market, is ending its first year of business on a high as the sector continues to show promise.PRS, owned by Graeme and Leanne Carling, has spent the last several months in talks with landlords across the UK as they develop their new company through business acquisition. They now have offers in place worth £130m.As well as private rental properties, PRS Group includes maintenance, management and development arms. And with more and more private landlords shedding their portfolio because of the heightened regulations and extra costs involved, PRS expects 2019 to be one of “rich pickings”, said Graeme Carling.PRS has secured financial backing from banks in the U.K., as well as individuals and investors overseas, and expects to reach 5000 rental units much earlier than previously planned. Graeme adds, “We have a very strict investment criteria. Fortunately, with the market being so buoyant, we are able to be very selective with our acquisitions.”PRS Group owns and manages 350+ rental properties all over Scotland, making the Carlings Scotland’s largest independent residential landlords.Read more about PRS.Graeme Carling residential landlords PRS Group Scotland January 22, 2019The NegotiatorWhat’s your opinion? Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.Please note: This is a site for professional discussion. Comments will carry your full name and company.This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.Related articles Letting agent fined £11,500 over unlicenced rent-to-rent HMO3rd May 2021 BREAKING: Evictions paperwork must now include ‘breathing space’ scheme details30th April 2021 City dwellers most satisfied with where they live30th April 2021 Home » News » Agencies & People » PRS Group finishes 2018 on ‘property high’, 2019 set to be even better previous nextAgencies & PeoplePRS Group finishes 2018 on ‘property high’, 2019 set to be even betterFast-expanding company says it has deals worth £130 million on the table.The Negotiator22nd January 201901,233 Views
Authorities KAKADU: Task Force Conducts Air Defence Exercise For the purpose of the exercise, the opposition aircraft were four Hawks, four GATs, two FA-18 and one LR 35 from the Royal Australian Air Force.Leading Seaman Claire Venn, Electronic Warfare Director, provided a brief to the Operations Room on the expected capabilities of the threats to the ship and then played a crucial role providing early warning, with the detection of surface and air contacts.“The serial was a success. We defeated multi-axis threats with little to no damage to the ship.“I feel that the result today is due to the preparation and training we put into responding to these potential real world scenarios,” Leading Seaman Venn said.Lieutenant Kane Mackey, Principal Warfare Officer, lead the fight for the ship in the Operations Room in partnership with the Officer of the Watch on the bridge.“The relationship between the bridge and operations is crucial in ensuring the ship is in the right place and the right time, so it can defend itself and its consorts,” Lieutenant Mackey said.“Multiple missile threats to the ship meant that missile defence solutions were often required simultaneously.“The Ops Room is a busy place during such a high intensity serial. Everyone had to multitask.“It’s like having to listen to three conversations at once and then prioritise each one,” Lieutenant Mackey said.The exercise was overseen by the Navy Sea Training Group and reinforced the importance of training to win in the maritime environment.KAKADU is the Royal Australian Navy’s larges maritime warfare exercise for the year, occurring in and off the coast of Darwin from 25 August to 12 September 2014.[mappress]Press Release, September 03, 2014; Image: Australian Navy Back to overview,Home naval-today KAKADU: Task Force Conducts Air Defence Exercise On Tuesday 2 September 2014, eight ships of the coalition Task Force defended themselves against 11 opposition aircraft as a part of an air defence exercise for KAKADU. The ships faced threats from a range of aircraft and had to respond to a simulated use of long range and short range missile deployments. View post tag: Exercise View post tag: conducts September 3, 2014 View post tag: Navy View post tag: Asia-Pacific View post tag: air View post tag: News by topic View post tag: Australia View post tag: Naval View post tag: Defence View post tag: KAKADU View post tag: Task-Force Share this article